Brokerage comparisonVerified 2026-05-20

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices vs Century 21

Premier franchise brand backed by Berkshire Hathaway vs Long-running franchise with global brand recognition.

SE

Reviewed by SofaBrain Editorial Team

Editorial Team · Last reviewed 2026-05-20

Net-income side by side

Computed at the realtor median: $120,000 annual GCI ÷ 12 transactions per year. Adjust the inputs on the live commission calculator.

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices

$81,000

estimated net take-home

GCI: $120,000
Brokerage share: −$36,000
Royalty: −$3,000

Century 21

$57,000

estimated net take-home

GCI: $120,000
Brokerage share: −$60,000
Royalty: −$3,000

Feature matrix

FeatureBHHSCentury 21
Commission modelsplitsplit
Default split70/3050/50
Annual cap
Monthly fee
Per-transaction fee
Royalty fee6%6%
Training programextensivestandard
Lead programoptionalbrokerage-provided
Stock awards
Profit share
Sponsorship residual
Publicly tradedPrivateHOUS
Approx agent count52,000145,000
HeadquartersIrvine, CAMadison, NJ (Anywhere Real Estate)
Founded$2,013$1,971

Best/worst fit for BHHS

Best for: Luxury / high-end agents wanting the Berkshire brand for client trust

Worst for: Newer agents — the brand premium does not translate to free leads

Tech stack: Suite, Resource Center, Lead Hub, MOXI

Best/worst fit for Century 21

Best for: Newer agents wanting a recognized brand + structured training

Worst for: Top producers — entry split is low; better to negotiate at another brokerage

Tech stack: Moxi, C21 University

FAQ

What's the biggest difference between Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices and Century 21?+

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices runs on a split model (70/30 split) while Century 21 runs on a split model (50/50 split).

Which is better for new agents?+

Newer agents typically benefit more from extensive training + lead programs. Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices: extensive training, optional leads. Century 21: standard training, brokerage-provided leads. The brokerage with more brokerage-provided leads + extensive training is usually the safer first move.

Which is better at high volume?+

At high volume (30+ transactions/year), cap-based and 100%-commission brokerages outperform split-based ones because the brokerage's share is capped while your output keeps growing. Neither is the cap/100%-commission option in this pair.

Does this comparison include lender/title splits?+

No. We model the brokerage's cut of your gross commission income (GCI) after the buyer-broker / seller-broker split between firms. Lender, title, and ancillary splits vary deal-to-deal and aren't modeled here.

More brokerage comparisons

Run your own numbers

Custom GCI, custom transaction count, all 12 brokerages compared side-by-side.

Open the commission calculator →

Sources