Brokerage comparisonVerified 2026-05-20

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices vs HomeSmart

Premier franchise brand backed by Berkshire Hathaway vs Flat-fee transaction model — keep nearly all commission.

SE

Reviewed by SofaBrain Editorial Team

Editorial Team · Last reviewed 2026-05-20

Net-income side by side

Computed at the realtor median: $120,000 annual GCI ÷ 12 transactions per year. Adjust the inputs on the live commission calculator.

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices

$81,000

estimated net take-home

GCI: $120,000
Brokerage share: −$36,000
Royalty: −$3,000

HomeSmart

$116,160

estimated net take-home

GCI: $120,000
Brokerage share: −$0
Monthly fees (×12): −$300
Per-tx fees: −$3,540

Feature matrix

FeatureBHHSHomeSmart
Commission modelsplitflat-fee
Default split70/30100/0
Annual cap
Monthly fee$25
Per-transaction fee$295
Royalty fee6%
Training programextensivestandard
Lead programoptionalagent-sourced
Stock awards
Profit share
Sponsorship residual
Publicly tradedPrivatePrivate
Approx agent count52,00024,000
HeadquartersIrvine, CAScottsdale, AZ
Founded$2,013$2,000

Best/worst fit for BHHS

Best for: Luxury / high-end agents wanting the Berkshire brand for client trust

Worst for: Newer agents — the brand premium does not translate to free leads

Tech stack: Suite, Resource Center, Lead Hub, MOXI

Best/worst fit for HomeSmart

Best for: Highest-volume agents — flat fee structure means margin grows linearly with volume

Worst for: Agents with <10 transactions/year — Realty ONE / eXp likely cheaper

Tech stack: RealSmart Agent (proprietary)

FAQ

What's the biggest difference between Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices and HomeSmart?+

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices runs on a split model (70/30 split) while HomeSmart runs on a flat-fee model (100/0 split).

Which is better for new agents?+

Newer agents typically benefit more from extensive training + lead programs. Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices: extensive training, optional leads. HomeSmart: standard training, agent-sourced leads. The brokerage with more brokerage-provided leads + extensive training is usually the safer first move.

Which is better at high volume?+

At high volume (30+ transactions/year), cap-based and 100%-commission brokerages outperform split-based ones because the brokerage's share is capped while your output keeps growing. Neither is the cap/100%-commission option in this pair.

Does this comparison include lender/title splits?+

No. We model the brokerage's cut of your gross commission income (GCI) after the buyer-broker / seller-broker split between firms. Lender, title, and ancillary splits vary deal-to-deal and aren't modeled here.

More brokerage comparisons

Run your own numbers

Custom GCI, custom transaction count, all 12 brokerages compared side-by-side.

Open the commission calculator →

Sources