Brokerage comparisonVerified 2026-05-20

Compass vs Sotheby's International Realty

Tech-forward brokerage with proprietary listing-marketing platform vs Luxury-focused global brand under Anywhere Real Estate.

SE

Reviewed by SofaBrain Editorial Team

Editorial Team · Last reviewed 2026-05-20

Net-income side by side

Computed at the realtor median: $120,000 annual GCI ÷ 12 transactions per year. Adjust the inputs on the live commission calculator.

Compass

$96,000

estimated net take-home

GCI: $120,000
Brokerage share: −$24,000

Sotheby's International Realty

$72,000

estimated net take-home

GCI: $120,000
Brokerage share: −$48,000

Feature matrix

FeatureCompassSotheby's
Commission modelsplitsplit
Default split80/2060/40
Annual cap
Monthly fee
Per-transaction fee
Royalty fee
Training programstandardextensive
Lead programoptionaloptional
Stock awards
Profit share
Sponsorship residual
Publicly tradedCOMPHOUS
Approx agent count29,00026,000
HeadquartersNew York, NYMadison, NJ
Founded$2,012$1,976

Best/worst fit for Compass

Best for: Productive agents in major metros wanting premium tech + strong brand

Worst for: Rural / small-market agents (limited Compass footprint outside major metros)

Tech stack: Compass CRM, Likely Compass AI, Compass One, Marketing Center

Best/worst fit for Sotheby's

Best for: Luxury-segment agents in major metros; global referral network

Worst for: Entry-level / sub-$500K market agents — brand requires luxury inventory

Tech stack: MOXI, Curate, SIR Mobile

FAQ

What's the biggest difference between Compass and Sotheby's International Realty?+

Compass runs on a split model (80/20 split) while Sotheby's International Realty runs on a split model (60/40 split).

Which is better for new agents?+

Newer agents typically benefit more from extensive training + lead programs. Compass: standard training, optional leads. Sotheby's International Realty: extensive training, optional leads. The brokerage with more brokerage-provided leads + extensive training is usually the safer first move.

Which is better at high volume?+

At high volume (30+ transactions/year), cap-based and 100%-commission brokerages outperform split-based ones because the brokerage's share is capped while your output keeps growing. Neither is the cap/100%-commission option in this pair.

Does this comparison include lender/title splits?+

No. We model the brokerage's cut of your gross commission income (GCI) after the buyer-broker / seller-broker split between firms. Lender, title, and ancillary splits vary deal-to-deal and aren't modeled here.

More brokerage comparisons

Run your own numbers

Custom GCI, custom transaction count, all 12 brokerages compared side-by-side.

Open the commission calculator →

Sources